Faith & Works
Bush campaign spokesman Steve Schmidt said Kerry's comment "was beyond the bounds of acceptable discourse and a sad exploitation of Scripture for a political attack."
That's from this article, "Bush Campaign Blasts Kerry's Bible Quote."
Here's what Democratic candidate John Kerry said:
"The Scriptures say, what does it profit, my brother, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? ... When we look at what is happening in America today, where are the works of compassion?"
The passage Kerry quotes -- James 2:14 -- was one I cited quite a bit when I worked for a group called "Evangelicals for Social Action." Our whole agenda at ESA was to get evangelicals to "walk the talk" -- to live their faith in deed as well as in word.
Martin Luther famously called the book of James "an epistle of straw" since its emphasis on works and action could be seen as undermining his emphasis on salvation by grace alone. (I don't see James as contradicting Luther, but apparently Luther did.)
James seems pretty timid, though, compared to 1 John, which is full of this kind of thing:
How does God's love abide in anyone who has the world's goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses help? Little children, let us love, not in word or speech, but in truth and action.
That passage -- the entire chapter -- was a favorite of Martin Luther's namesake, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.
Dr. King, according to Bush campaign spokesman Steve Schmidt, regularly went "beyond the bounds of acceptable discourse." Dr. King was a ruthless, notorious "exploiter" of scripture.
I'd weigh in here on how ridiculous and hypocritical it is for the Bush campaign to suddenly claim that scripture-quoting is off limits, except that Amy Sullivan and Kevin at Lean Left have already said everything I'd want to on the subject. (See also this commentary, from Avedon Carol of The Sideshow.)
Schmidt's bizarre claim is that only certain people -- his people -- are allowed to quote scripture. James' strawy point is that it doesn't matter what you say, it matters what you do. Allow me to exploit one more passage, from Matthew 7. This time it's Jesus talking:
You will know them by their fruits ... Every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit.
Or, as they say in writing workshops: show, don't tell.
UPDATE: Corrected to get Kevin's name right. (sorry, Kevin) Speaking of whom, one observation in his post that struck me as particularly astute was how very Catholic this passage from James is (hence Luther's dislike of it). One wonders how much the brouhaha over Kerry's quoting of scripture arises from his choice of this particular scripture, and whether part of the dynamic at work here may be some of the perennial Protestant/Catholic dispute.









hey .... is supporting abortion a good or bad fruit?
Posted by: mark | Mar 30, 2004 at 07:30 PM
hey .... is supporting abortion a good or bad fruit? What about the verse that says "if you don't work you don't eat" 2 thes. 3:10
so much for wellfare
Posted by: mark | Mar 30, 2004 at 07:38 PM
I don't see why the Bush camp is complaining about Kerry using Scripture in the campaign. Kerry claims to be a Christian does he not? Why not challenge Kerry's position on abortion and homosexual rights on a biblical basis?
BTW, what was the context of Kerry's biblical citation? Surely, it wasn't an unspecific ad-hominem troll?
Posted by: Jeff | Mar 30, 2004 at 07:55 PM
Fred
Thanks for the link and the compliment, but my name is kevin :)
Posted by: kevin | Mar 30, 2004 at 10:53 PM
To judge from the remarks of Kerry quoted here, he did not actually mention Bush. Why did the Bushites assume that "When we look at what is happening in America today, where are the works of compassion?" was referring to them?
Posted by: jonforest | Mar 30, 2004 at 11:57 PM
Je -- er, Kevin --
All fixed. Very sorry.
Posted by: Fred | Mar 31, 2004 at 04:18 AM
Brad DeLong quotes the NYTimes
Plan to battle AIDS worldwide is falling short: ...
While Mr. Bush promised in his 2003 State of the Union address to spend $15 billion over five years on AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean, his budget requests have fallen far short of that goal. For the most recent donation to the Global Fund, he requested only $200 million, although Congress authorized $550 million.
Posted by: rdb | Mar 31, 2004 at 08:50 AM
Fred
Thanks, and no problem :)
Posted by: kevin | Mar 31, 2004 at 10:13 AM