The Arlington County Court refused to grant me the right to perform marriages in Virginia, apparently on the grounds that my "congregation" does not own a building.
I presented my certificate of ordination and documentation of the 501c3 status of the Order of the White Moon, which ordained me. Since my Order is incorporated in California, the secretary asked me if I had a congregation in Virginia; I said yes. She asked me to list the address of the congregation, and I said that we don't have a building. She asked, "So, what, you just meet in each other's homes?" I said yes, we meet in each other's homes, or out of doors (Wicca is, after all, an earth-based religion, but I thought that mentioning that would only be prejudicial to my situation).
The secretary left and came back with the Clerk of Court who said that they were not going to approve me. I asked if it was because we don't have a building. He said, "Yes, you don't have a building, and there were a few other things." I asked him if he would give me a written list of the reasons I was being denied. He refused; he offered to show me the relevant section (Sec 20-23) of the Virginia Code. I assured him that I had read the Code, and asked again if he would give me more specific reasons I was being denied. He said that approving these applications was at his "discretion" and that he didn't "feel" I met the qualifications, but he wouldn't tell me how. He told me that I could apply to another court in another county but that he thought they would probably give me the same answer.
Has property ownership now become the measure of what constitutes a "real" religion in Virginia, or at least in Arlington County? Or is this another example of anti-Pagan discrimination at work?
Patchwork enforcement and a history of discrimination
Virginia is one of the few states in the US that requires clergy members to register with a circuit court in order to be able to perform valid marriages. The requirements in Sec 20-23 of the Code state that the minister must present proof of ordination and "of his being in regular communion" with the organization that ordained him.
These requirements are apparently interpreted in widely varying ways across various circuits in Virginia, as different courts' websites list different types of documentation - or none - that may be required. For courts that openly state they require more than just proof of ordination, the way they ask for information gives tremendous privilege to traditionally-organized, i.e., Christian, groups. Although these forms sometimes refer vaguely to a "person of authority" all of the named roles (deacons, elders, pastors, trustees or church clerks) are associated with mainline Protestant churches and church organizations. Other forms ask for copies of charters, bylaws and outlines of organizational structures. And if granting these applications really is up to the "discretion" of the Clerk of Court, there is wide scope for potential discrimination against minority religions with or without the fig leaf of requiring a "location" and other organizational trappings potentially beyond the reach of minority religious organizations.
This problem goes back more than a decade; in 1999, the American Civil Liberties Union helped another Wiccan priestess get her application in this situation approved.
I think it's not unreasonable that I am concerned about what kind of documentation will satisfy the court. I serve multiple groups, one of which meets in a designated location, but since it is an open circle, the people who attend are mostly not members of my ordaining organization. If I provide documentation of this group meeting in a specific location, will the court then ask how many people attend, and how often we meet? What will they require to conclude that I am "really" a High Priestess in a "real" religion?
Why this matters
This is about more than performing weddings. This decision has a chilling effect on me trying to function as clergy in other ways; if the Court will not recognize me as legitimate clergy in this situation, will my right to confidentiality be protected? How can I assure people who come to me for counseling that their communications with me are protected by clergy privilege?
And since this is one of the two major forms of government approval used by a wide range of institutions and organizations to determine whether someone is a "real" clergy member, it can impact my ability to reach out to those who have particular needs: people in hospitals, the military, and prisons all need clergy services, but those institutions are much more likely to deny me the ability to minister to the people involved if I can't say that I'm approved by the State of Virginia to perform marriages.
And although I might have my application granted if I tried another court, that does nothing to resolve the doubt cast on my status by the court with jurisdiction over where I live and do most of my ministry. If another court approved me, it would only serve to highlight the irregular and potentially biased variations in granting recognition across jurisdictions.
What you can do
I currently plan to gather additional supporting documentation and reapply, and if I am denied again, to ask whether I can appeal to a judge of the court. I am also currently seeking advice from the ACLU, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, and the Lady Liberty League. Here's what you can do to help:
First, get the word out. The more Pagans and followers of "non traditional" religions pull together, the better our chances of being recognized as "legitimate" in these kinds of situations.
Second, If you are a Pagan clergyperson (or a celebrant of a non-traditional Christian religion) in Virginia and you have applied to perform marriages, please email me. If you were approved, I'd like to know when you were approved, in what court, with what paperwork, and what questions they asked, both written and verbal. People who have been declined, please tell me that too. The more information I have for comparison the better.
Third, I would also like to be able to present letters of support from other Pagan and "non traditional" clergy or officiants and potentially from Pagan and non-mainstream Christian organizations that ordain people, especially ones that ordain people all over the country. If you're interested, please contact me. And if you have other ideas about how to help, please speak up!
Fourth, please provide spiritual and magical support. Pray and send energy that I am able to gather the evidence I need and make a convincing argument, that the court will grant my new application swiftly, and that I may stay positive and be patient throughout this whole process.
Fifth, keep an eye on "Things you can do" section of "This week in The Slacktiverse" for further information about things that can be done.
I sincerely hope that together we can ensure this is the last time a Pagan in Virginia has her credentials questioned and her status as clergy denied.
NOTE: This piece is adapted from an post published at the same time at Literata's blog. TBAT waived the normal time lag for crossposted material due to the pressing and important nature of the subject of the post.
The Slacktiverse is a community blog. Content reflects the individual opinions of the contributors. We welcome disagreement in the comment threads, and invite anyone who wishes to present an alternative interpretation of a situation to write and submit a post.